Federal Constitutional Court asserts it is not bound by Supreme Court rulings
• Justice Rizvi says ‘precedential hierarchy’ stands restructured after 27th Amendment • Court will follow earlier jurisprudence if not incompatible with evolved constitutional values ISLAMABAD: The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) has dispelled the impression that it was unconditionally bound by Supreme Court pronouncements, a position that was not necessarily required under the constitutional framework. Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi explained that frequent references to Supreme Court judgements in FCC decisions might otherwise create a mistaken belief that the FCC was irrevocably bound by such rulings. The judge had made these observations in a judgement upholding the validity of a marriage between a Christian woman and a Muslim man, while dismissing a habeas corpus petition filed by her father seeking the recovery of his daughter. The judgement explained that Article 189 of the Constitution, which formerly accorded binding force to the judgements of the Supreme Court upon ...